{"id":2403,"date":"2013-12-14T11:37:31","date_gmt":"2013-12-14T09:37:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/?p=2403"},"modified":"2013-12-14T11:47:52","modified_gmt":"2013-12-14T09:47:52","slug":"un-anti-torture-experts-rebuke-uzbekistan-for-its-abysmal-record","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/2013\/12\/un-anti-torture-experts-rebuke-uzbekistan-for-its-abysmal-record\/","title":{"rendered":"UN Anti-Torture Experts Rebuke Uzbekistan for Its Abysmal Record"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In an unusually scathing report that is in line with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fidh.org\/en\/eastern-europe-central-asia\/Uzbekistan,287\/14394-un-anti-torture-experts-rebuke-uzbekistan-for-its-abysmal-record\">FIDH<\/a>\u2019s own findings, the United Nations\u2019 main anti-torture body expressed its utmost concerns over the widespread and systematic use of torture in Uzbekistan. The UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) called for prompt, impartial and effective investigations into all allegations of torture and ill-treatment. This follows an exceptionally heated CAT session, during which the head of the Uzbek delegation shouted at UN experts and accused them of \u201cpolitical bias\u201d. In the face of numerous, well-documented allegations that torture is not only systematic and unpunished, but also encouraged by the authorities, Uzbekistan chose to make a mockery of its international obligations.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2405\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/zendaan.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2405\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2405\" alt=\"Source: uznews.net\" src=\"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/zendaan.jpg\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/zendaan.jpg 300w, https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/zendaan-240x159.jpg 240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2405\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: uznews.net<\/p><\/div>\n<p>FIDH particularly welcomes the fact that the \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/tbinternet.ohchr.org\/_layouts\/treatybodyexternal\/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT\/C\/UZB\/CO\/4&amp;Lang=en\">concluding observations<\/a>\u201d published by the CAT highlight the practice of forced sterilisation of women and sexual violence against prisoners in Uzbekistan. The CAT specifically pointed to the case of Ms. Mutabar Tadjibaeva, Director of FIDH\u2019s member organisation\u201cFiery Hearts Club\u201d, who is now living in exile in France. Ms. Tadjibaeva lodged a complaint with the UN Human Rights Committee for being tortured and forcibly sterilised while imprisoned in Uzbekistan in 2008-2010.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMutabar Tadjibaeva is an incredibly strong woman and human rights defender who had the courage to bear witness to the unspeakable acts of torture she went through in Uzbekistan\u201d, said Ms. Tolekan Ismailova, FIDH Vice-President. \u201cIn Geneva, Uzbekistan delegates openly lied about Ms. Tadjibaeva\u2019s health in order to discredit her and her work. The authorities of Uzbekistan should investigate her case, prosecute and punish those responsible, and provide her with the reparation to which she is entitled. Instead, they continue to psychologically harass her\u201d, she added.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is deplorable that the Uzbek government unashamedly keeps denying torture and in return accuses the UN of bias,\u201d said Karim Lahidji, FIDH President. \u201cThe Uzbek authorities must start abiding by their own international obligations, which they are currently not doing, not even to a minimal degree.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On 29 October 2013, during the session in which Uzbekistan was reviewed by the CAT, Mr. Akmal Saidov, the head of the Uzbek delegation, claimed that Ms. Tadjibaeva was never tortured and that she explicitly asked for medical help, which was provided through sterilisation. The CAT is in charge of monitoring implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Torture by its Party States. Uzbekistan submitted its fourth periodic report this year, which was reviewed on 29-30 October 2013. The CAT adopted its concluding observations on 14 November 2013, which contain a number of recommendations. In September 2013, prior to the review, the Uzbek Bureau on Human Rights and Rule of Law (UBHRRL), with the support of FIDH, published its report on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fidh.org\/IMG\/pdf\/cat_uzbekistanreport_september2013.pdf\">Uzbekistan\u2019s Implementation of the CAT<\/a>&#8220;.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #ffffbf; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; color: #000000; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; height: auto; line-height: normal; text-align: left; width: auto; direction: ltr; z-index: 99995; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; border-width: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an unusually scathing report that is in line with FIDH\u2019s own findings, the United Nations\u2019 main anti-torture body expressed its utmost concerns over the widespread and systematic use of torture in Uzbekistan. The UN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2405,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[90,34,85,65,53],"tags":[195],"class_list":["post-2403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-editor-selection","category-fidh-news","category-human-rights","category-others","category-prison-prisoners-and-enforced-disappearance","tag-torture-uzbekistan","country-asia","Documents-conventions"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2403"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2403\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2409,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2403\/revisions\/2409"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2405"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openasia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}